Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 08:50

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Top prospects for 2025 Draft arrive in Buffalo for Scouting Combine - NHL.com
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Here's a fresh look at Clockwork Revolution, coming "in due time" - Eurogamer
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
6 Things Women over 50 Should Do Every Night Before Bed, According to Dietitians - AOL.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Yale’s new Google Home smart lock is here — but it costs more thanks to tariffs - The Verge
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why is it easy to make money in the USA?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Summer Game Fest June 2025: Everything announced - Eurogamer
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Scientists hooking flies on cocaine to study addiction: Reports - WSYR
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.